A taxonomy of scaling agility

2022 | Journal of Strategic Information Systems | Citations: 0

Authors: Limaj, Everist; Bernroider, Edward W. N.

Abstract: Driven by environmental uncertainty, many organizations today attempt to achieve ... Expand

Abstract: Driven by environmental uncertainty, many organizations today attempt to achieve agility at scale. However, given the variety and complexity of these efforts, there is currently a limited understanding in terms of their most relevant configurations, especially over the process of change. Based on an iterative taxonomy development approach grounded in design science, we present a taxonomy to structure, configure, and update scaling agility. The resulting multi-dimensional classification system offers an integrative view on elements only selectively considered in prior research. While offering a conceptual anchor for further research, we also provide specific configurations covering three different stages of scaling agility. Collapse

Topics: organizational change organization structure human resource management business process innovation organizational culture

Methods: qualitative interview literature sample reference modelling personal interview case study

Theories: theory of change

LEGIT Methodology: Towards Capturing Legal Compatibility of Design Science Artifacts

2021 | DESRIST | Citations: 0

Authors: Dickhaut, Ernestine; Janson, Andreas; Leimeister, Jan Marco

Abstract: Higher legal standards with regards to the data protection of individuals such a ... Expand

Abstract: Higher legal standards with regards to the data protection of individuals such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are increasing the pressure on developers of IT artifacts. Typically, when developing systems, we subsequently evaluate them with users to elaborate aspects such as user experience perceptions. However, nowadays, other evaluation aspects such as legality and data policy issues are also important criteria for system development. For this purpose, we introduce LEGIT (legal design science evaluation), which provides developers with guidance when considering legal requirements. We use the case of the GDPR to illustrate the feasibility, applicability, and benefit to the development process. With this novel method adapted from law research, we are able to derive actionable guidance for developers to evaluate developer efforts in increasing legal compatibility. To illustrate our methodological approach, in this paper, we describe the key steps of the method with respect to the evaluation of a learning assistant. We develop an AI-based learning assistant for university students to demonstrate the application of the novel evaluation method. We briefly discuss how this procedure can serve as the foundation for a new evaluation method of legally compatible systems in design science research. Collapse

Topics: artificial intelligence legal context user experience General Data Protection Regulation information system use

Methods: design artifact design science design science evaluation simulation design process

Evolution of Serious Games to Support Lifelong Learning and Decision Making: Design and Implementation of a Financial Literacy Game

2021 | HICSS | Citations: 0

Authors: Rasco, Aldrich; Chan, Johnny; Peko, Gabrielle; Sundaram, David

Abstract: Considering the economic changes of recent times, financial literacy arises as a ... Expand

Abstract: Considering the economic changes of recent times, financial literacy arises as a focal point of interest. COVID-19, coupled with the culmination of other societal issues, underlines the importance of understanding sensible personal finance. Nationwide lockdown and other economic constraints put us in immobilised positions to confide in safe and accessible entertainment havens such as games. Herein lies an interesting research opportunity to progress personal wellbeing and capability despite the extant issues of recent times. The paper demonstrates the design and implementation of an evolving serious game that supports lifelong learning and decision making relating to personal finance. The example is a useful account of serious games’ evolutionary potential to incrementally support users through lifelong learning. The game’s holistic design incorporates autonomy, motivation, and support structures to ensure that lifelong learning and decision making is effectively managed through an evolving system. The corresponding implementation evidences the sheer potential of serious games. Collapse

Topics: decision making decision support system personalization skill acquisition usability

Methods: design artifact design science design science evaluation meta analysis

BECAUSE YOUR TAXONOMY IS WORTH IT: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR TAXONOMY EVALUATION

2019 | European Conference On Information Systems | Citations: 0

Authors: Szopinski, Daniel; Schoormann, Thorsten; Kundisch, Dennis

Abstract: Taxonomies constitute one fundamental type of artefact in design science, descri ... Expand

Abstract: Taxonomies constitute one fundamental type of artefact in design science, describing and classifying existing or future objects of a domain. Taxonomies support researchers and practitioners with analysing and understanding a domain, which in turn is a prerequisite for theory building. Despite the increasing interest in taxonomies (and methodological guidance for building them), there is hardly any guidance for researchers on how to rigorously evaluate taxonomies. Based on a literature analysis, this study sheds light on the question of whether, when, and how researchers currently evaluate taxonomies. We critically synthesize and comprehensively review 306 articles that are concerned with taxonomies. Surprisingly, we find that taxonomies are rarely evaluated in IS research, nor is there any consistency in terms of methods used for evaluations. We describe the methods used by IS researchers to evaluate taxonomies after taxonomy building has been completed. Being the first to systematically analyse taxonomy evaluation, we propose a preliminary version of a framework for taxonomy evaluation which enables researchers to choose among the wide range of taxonomy evaluation methods available. Our study advances an informed and purposeful evaluation of taxonomies and contributes to bridging the gap between abstract design science evaluation strategies and concrete taxonomy evaluation methods. Collapse

Topics: knowledge base gamification system development method

Methods: literature sample qualitative interview personal interview literature study design science evaluation

Re-Visiting IS Design Science Artifacts: Making a Case for Critical Realism

2017 | HICSS | Citations: 0

Authors: Uppström, Elin

Abstract: In this paper critical realism is suggested as a suitable philosophical assumpti ... Expand

Abstract: In this paper critical realism is suggested as a suitable philosophical assumption to guide a separate, stand-alone retrospective evaluation of design science projects and artifacts. A main contribution of the paper is to argue that knowledge can be gained in retrospective evaluations of design science projects regardless of the success or nonsuccess of the project itself. Thereby, retrospective evaluation complements current evaluations that are mostly means-end focused. The argumentation is supported through re-visiting two e-government design science projects, which can be considered both as failures and successes depending on the framing. Critical realism puts focus on knowing through making and widens the use of design science in areas where utility is not the main goal. Future research should focus on providing more details on how a critical realism retrospective in design science should be carried out. Collapse

Topics: government system problem solving knowledge creation

Methods: design science design artifact simulation survey design artifact testing

Building a Software Tool for Transparent and Efficient Process Assessments in IT Service Management

2014 | DESRIST | Citations: 0

Authors: Shrestha, Anup; Cater-Steel, Aileen; Toleman, Mark; Tan, Wui-Gee

Abstract: Process improvements provide a structured approach for organisations to improve ... Expand

Abstract: Process improvements provide a structured approach for organisations to improve the way they operate. A number of process improvement methodologies such as ISO9000, TQM, Six Sigma, Lean, and Agile have been proposed over the last few decades and subsequently software tools have been developed to apply these methodologies. However determination of process ca-pability to measure improvement is predominantly conducted by expert process assessors and consultants with proprietary frameworks. We propose the use of the international standard for process assessment ISO/IEC 15504 for a transparent measurement of process capability. We also demonstrate development of a software tool based on the standard that can facilitate organisations to assess their processes efficiently. In this paper, we explain the development, implementation and preliminary evaluation of a software-mediated process assessment approach in the area of IT Service Management at a large public-sector IT organisation in Queensland, Australia. This paper’s contribution is the integration of the design science research methodology with the task-technology fit theory for the development of the software tool as a research artefact. For practitioners the project demonstrates transparent and efficient assessment of IT service processes to facilitate continual improvement. Collapse

Topics: requirements analysis IT service management systems development knowledge base project management

Methods: design principle design science survey focus group case study

Theories: theory of task technology fit

Information Fusion in Continuous Assurance

2011 | European Conference On Information Systems | Citations: 0

Authors: Perols, Johan L.; Murthy, Uday S.

Abstract: We extend continuous assurance research by proposing a novel continuous assuranc ... Expand

Abstract: We extend continuous assurance research by proposing a novel continuous assurance architecture grounded in information fusion research. Existing continuous assurance architectures focus primarily on methods of monitoring assurance clients’ systems to detect anomalous activities and have not addressed the question of how to process the detected anomalies. Consequently, actual implementations of these systems typically detect a large number of anomalies, with the resulting information overload leading to suboptimal decision making due to human information processing limitations. The proposed architecture addresses these issues by performing anomaly detection, aggregation and evaluation. Within the proposed architecture, artifacts developed in prior continuous assurance, ontology, and artificial intelligence research are used to perform the detection, aggregation and evaluation information fusion tasks. The architecture contributes to the academic continuous assurance literature and has implications for practitioners involved in the development of more robust and useful continuous assurance systems. Collapse

Topics: knowledge representation artificial intelligence business process management

Methods: ontological modelling design science machine learning artificial neural network design science evaluation

A Design Science Based Evaluation Framework for Patterns

2010 | ACM SIGMIS Database | Citations: 27

Authors: Petter, Stacie; Khazanchi, Deepak; Murphy, John D.

Abstract: Patterns were originally developed in the field of architecture as a mechanism f ... Expand

Abstract: Patterns were originally developed in the field of architecture as a mechanism for communicating good solutions to recurring classes of problems. Since then, many researchers and practitioners have created patterns to describe effective solutions to problems associated with disparate areas such as virtual project management, human-computer interaction, software development and engineering, and design science research. We believe that the development of patterns is a design science activity in which an artifact (i.e., a pattern) is created to communicate about and improve upon the current state-of-practice. Design science research has two critical components, creation and evaluation of an artifact. While many patterns have been created, few, if any, have been evaluated in this sense. In this paper, we propose a framework to evaluate patterns in any domain and provide examples of how to use the evaluation framework. This process of evaluation could help researchers refine extant patterns and improve the possibility of creating sustainable best practices for a given domain. We believe this evaluation framework begins an important dialogue related to the evaluation of patterns as artifacts of design science research. We draw upon the literature associated with patterns, evaluation of design science research, and research methods to develop this framework for evaluating patterns in a more consistent and rigorous manner. Collapse

Topics: evaluation criteria project management human computer interaction usability anonymity

Methods: design science mixed method design artifact testing design science evaluation

Theories: measurement theory